Writing content about Senegal in World Cup

The user provided a Chinese sentence about Senegal being the only team eliminated due to fair play points in World Cup history. It looks like they want me to create an article or stats analysis on this topic, focusing on the 2018 World Cup. I'll make sure to present the content in Chinese, providing clear and concise information, possibly using bullets or short sections with optional bold headings. No need for complex formatting—just the facts.Explaining Senegal's elimination in 2018

I should provide a clear explanation of fair play points, detailing how Senegal was eliminated in the 2018 World Cup group stage alongside Japan. In Group H, both teams ended with 4 points and 0 goal difference. The final standings had Colombia with 6 points, Japan and Senegal each with 4, and Poland with 3. I’ll summarize the relevant match results for clarity. Colombia's goals scored were 5, against 2, giving them a goal difference of +3.Detailing Senegal's elimination through fair play points

Japan's matches included a win against Colombia (2-1), a draw with Senegal (2-2), and a loss to Poland (0-1), resulting in 4 goals scored and 4 conceded, giving them a goal difference of 0 and 4 points. Senegal had the same record. They tied in head-to-head results, and the tiebreaker came down to fair play points, where Japan had fewer yellow cards. Ultimately, Senegal was eliminated due to worse fair play points, making them the first team to be eliminated this way.Confirming Senegal's unique status

Senegal's elimination due to fair play points in 2018 is indeed unique in World Cup history. In 2022, no teams were eliminated through fair play; Germany was out on goal difference, while South Korea advanced based on goals scored. In Group C, Mexico and Poland were tied on points and goal difference as well, but that didn't lead to a fair play situation. Since there was no other instance, Senegal remains the only team eliminated this way.Drafting a concise article on Senegal's elimination

I plan to create an article focusing on fairness points, detailing yellow card counts and match statistics for Senegal and Japan. I can state that Senegal had 6 yellow cards compared to Japan's 4, which contributed to Japan advancing. Following the “数说世界杯” format, I can use bullet points to present the tie-breaking order per FIFA 2018 rules, along with a brief timeline of match events, including the controversial tactics used by Japan.

I'll structure the article with sections like 背景, 公平竞赛规则, 2018年H组数据, and 争议与影响, all while maintaining accuracy and clarity. Here’s a list of stats:

• 积分相同：4分
• 净胜球：0
• 进球：4
• 相互战绩：2-2
• 公平竞赛分：日本-4，塞内加尔-6
• 淘汰原因：黄牌数更少的日本排名靠前

Fair play scoring will include:

• 黄牌 -1
• 两黄变一红 -3
• 直接红牌 -4
• 黄牌+直接红 -5

数说看点

• 唯一案例：截至2022年卡塔尔世界杯，塞内加尔是世界杯历史上唯一一支因“公平竞赛积分”被淘汰的球队（发生于2018年俄罗斯世界杯）。
• 所在小组：2018 年 H 组（哥伦比亚、日本、塞内加尔、波兰）。

规则速览（2018 版）

• 排名顺序：积分 → 净胜球 → 进球数 → 相互战绩积分 → 相互战绩净胜球 → 相互战绩进球数 → 公平竞赛积分 → 抽签。
• 公平竞赛积分（分数越高越差）：黄牌 -1；两黄变一红 -3；直接红 -4；黄牌+直接红 -5（单场同一球员只计最重一次）。

关键数据（H 组最终）

• 日本与塞内加尔三大指标完全相同：积分 4、净胜球 0、进球数 4；相互战绩 2-2。
• 公平竞赛比拼：日本 -4，塞内加尔 -6。日本黄牌更少，压线晋级，塞内加尔出局。
• 同组战绩回顾：
  • 日本 2-1 哥伦比亚、2-2 塞内加尔、0-1 波兰
  • 塞内加尔 2-1 波兰、2-2 日本、0-1 哥伦比亚

比赛情境

• 小组末轮，日本在 0-1 落后波兰的末段选择降低对抗、控制风险，避免新增黄牌；与此同时塞内加尔 0-1 不敌哥伦比亚。两队各拿 4 分，日本凭更好的公平竞赛分晋级，引发“消极比赛/策略管理”的争议。

意义与影响

• 里程碑式首次：2018 年是世界杯首次将公平竞赛分真正用作出线的决定性条件。
• 倡导与争议并存：规则鼓励减少犯规与非体育道德行为，但也可能在极端情境下改变末轮比赛风险管理与观赏性。

需要我把塞内加尔当届的逐场黄牌分布、犯规数据或关键判罚时序列出来吗？