Considering transfer implications

I should propose verifying some details and asking for user approval if needed. The instructions mention that approvals on-failure are the default, so I can check for that if necessary. The user might simply want to post "TBR: ...", and I can provide a quick analysis. If true, it could disrupt Liverpool's wage structure, suggesting Salah might leave, which could lead to internal parity issues. I’ll compare to Newcastle’s situation too. Should I check for details?Responding to the rumor

I want to acknowledge that it’s just a rumor. TBR often shares claims, but their reliability can be mixed. I think it’s important to ask for the source link too.

For credibility, I’ll verify the primary source and cross-check with Liverpool and Newcastle beat reporters. If the wages exceed 300k, that could impact the wage hierarchy, hinting at Salah's contract status. Newcastle will demand a large fee for any transfer, but I should check on the release clause too.Considering negotiation options

I realize that negotiation will be necessary here. I can offer a few options for the user: 1) I can fact-check the information now; 2) Summarize other reports; 3) Draft a post or thread; or 4) Update a tracker. I want to keep it short and straightforward.

I definitely need to avoid browsing without first asking the user what they would prefer. Oh, and since they wrote in Chinese, I'll respond in Chinese too!

这是转会小道消息口径。几点快速判断：

• 信息源：TBR/The Boot Room多为二手汇总，准确率一般，需看其引用的原始记者是谁。
• 薪资对比：利物浦队内顶薪近年为萨拉赫（约35万镑/周级别）。给伊萨克30万+将打破或逼近薪资结构上限，除非俱乐部已规划为核心建队签约。
• 交易可行性：纽卡无公开解约金条款披露，转会需高额转会费；PSR压力常在财年结算前（6/30）更敏感，冬窗推进难度更高但非不可能。
• 媒体侧信号：若靠谱，通常会被保罗·乔伊斯、奥恩斯坦、皮尔斯等一线跟队/权威转述；若只在二三级源扩散，可信度有限。

需要我现在替你核验原报道和一线记者的跟进吗？我可以：

1. 快速查证源头与是否有权威跟进；
2. 做一版简短评估帖/推文草稿；
3. 做薪资与转会费影响的简表对比。